Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

About

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeGetting StartedGetting StartedInstalling DNN ...Installing DNN ...Is DNN9 stable enough to upgrade to?Is DNN9 stable enough to upgrade to?
Previous
 
Next
New Post
10/31/2017 10:56 AM
 
So, whats the latest regarding DNN9 these days, stable enough to upgrade to know without to many problems or lack of functionality?
 
New Post
10/31/2017 12:54 PM
 

Yes, stable! You should upgrade.



Try our powerful shopping cart module for DotNetNuke!
 
New Post
11/29/2017 8:52 PM
 
I disagree. I just installed a fresh copy of DNN 9.1.1 in my development environment. It has 2 errors in DDRActionsMenu.ascx. At line 2, "The file '/Desktopmodules/DDRMenu/Actions.ascx' does not exist". At line 8, "Unknown server tag 'dnn:ACTIONS'". Obviously, they are really a single error, but for 9.1.1 to ship with a compile error in the base code is not good.
 
New Post
11/29/2017 10:32 PM
 
Richard White wrote:
I disagree. I just installed a fresh copy of DNN 9.1.1 in my development environment. It has 2 errors in DDRActionsMenu.ascx. At line 2, "The file '/Desktopmodules/DDRMenu/Actions.ascx' does not exist". At line 8, "Unknown server tag 'dnn:ACTIONS'". Obviously, they are really a single error, but for 9.1.1 to ship with a compile error in the base code is not good.



Actually, the source version of DNN has always been a nightmare to even get to compile in Visual Studio, so that is nothing new. I really recommend the non source version, even if you like me consider yourself an experienced .NET developer.

That said, I must say that 9.1.1 is much better than the first DNN 9 version and overall I am quite impressed with what has been achieved. Yes, there are still bugs but overall there seem to be a positive forward motion with DNN that I have not seen in many years. Would not do a live upgrade of an installation without setting up a test enviroment first though as there are still a few pitfalls.
 
New Post
12/8/2017 12:11 AM
 
IMO, it depends on the extensions used on your DNN instance, the less the easier an upgrade should be.
In any case, you should try upfront the upgrade on a clone of your sites.
DNN 9.2.0 will solve numerous known issues (but also introduces new features with new issues to expect)

Cheers from Germany,
Sebastian Leupold

dnnWerk - The DotNetNuke Experts   German Spoken DotNetNuke User Group

Speed up your DNN Websites with TurboDNN
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeGetting StartedGetting StartedInstalling DNN ...Installing DNN ...Is DNN9 stable enough to upgrade to?Is DNN9 stable enough to upgrade to?


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out