DNN Community Blog

Do you have useful information that you would like to share with the DNN Community in a featured article or blog? If so, please contact community@dnnsoftware.com.

 


Microsoft Announces Open Technologies Inc. Subsidiary

Windows Open Source

A few weeks ago Microsoft surprised many folks in the industry by announcing a new wholly owned subsidiary known as Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. The stated goal of the new enterprise is to advance the company’s investment in openness – including interoperability, open standards and open source.

"The subsidiary provides a new way of engaging in a more clearly defined manner. This new structure will help facilitate the interaction between Microsoft's proprietary development processes and the company's open innovation efforts and relationships with open source and open standards communities," said Jean Paoli, who becomes president of the subsidiary after serving as Microsoft's general manager of interoperability strategy.

Since Microsoft chose to trickle out the announcement without much fanfare and without any detailed specifics, there has been a lot of speculation by industry analysts and media in the weeks since. Depending on their level of paranoia for the software giant, people seemed to fall into one of two camps, those who think that Microsoft created the subsidiary because of a desire for greater interoperability and compatibility, and those who feel they were looking for ways to protect their extensive patent portfolio. I actually think that neither of these conclusions were the primary driver. Instead, I personally think it has to do with IP governance.

Based on my experience as a founding interim director and advisor of the Outercurve Foundation, I have some insight into one of Microsoft’s previous open source initiatives. The mission of the Outercurve Foundation is to enable the exchange of code and ideas between commercial software companies and open source communities. Microsoft was the sole founding sponsor of the Foundation, providing the initial funding to create the non-profit organization and playing an instrumental role in defining its bylaws and agenda. Conceptually it appears that there is high degree of overlap in the goals of the Outercurve Foundation and the new Open Technologies Inc. subsidiary. However, it is important to note that the Outercurve Foundation was established as a completely independent entity, not owned or controlled by Microsoft in any way. I believe that this may have been the catalyst for Microsoft’s decision to spin up a new open source commercial subsidiary rather than relying on the existing foundation.

The Outercurve Foundation utilizes a Gallery model for managing open source projects. There are currently four galleries which represent a variety of projects, with the majority based on Microsoft technology. Some open source projects have been contributed by the community and others originated within Microsoft. The important thing to note is in regards to project governance. In the majority of cases, the copyright for the open source projects intellectual property has been signed over to the Outercurve Foundation by the project founders. In turn, the Outercurve Foundation provides a variety of benefits including legal indemnification and IP management of contributor license agreements. However, this transfer of ownership to a non-profit foundation is not appropriate for every open source project. And I think this has created a bit of a dilemma for Microsoft over time.

As Microsoft has become more open in recent years, it has wanted to share more assets with the community. However, there is fairly clear evidence that Microsoft and Open Source are still “strange bedfellows” as they have not been able to share IP in a consistent manner. For example, Microsoft transferred ownership of the ASP.NET AJAX project to the Outercurve Foundation back in 2009 where the project was then released under a standard BSD open source license. Similarly, it transferred ownership of Orchard and WebFormsMVP. However, when Microsoft announced that it intended to release ASP.NET MVC under an open source license ( Microsoft Public License - MS-PL ), it did not transfer the IP to the Outercurve Foundation. Instead, it chose to retain ownership of the IP and continue to develop it internally.

So I think its not a coincidence that the announcement of the Open Technologies Inc. subsidiary comes hot on the heels of the announcement a few weeks earlier that the ASP.NET Web API and ASP.NET Web Pages ( including the Razor parsing engine ) are now available under an open source Apache 2.0 license. My hunch is that Microsoft Legal did not feel comfortable transferring these sizable technology assets to a third party foundation for governance. Rather, it might make more sense for this IP to be managed by an official commercial subsidiary of Microsoft, as it gives them much greater control and flexibility over how they engage with the community, accept contributions, and allow Microsoft employees to assist in its ongoing development.

I guess we will just have to wait and see how this new Open Technologies Inc. initiative from Microsoft evolves…

Comments

There are currently no comments, be the first to post one.

Comment Form

Only registered users may post comments.

NewsArchives


July 2014 (17)
June 2014 (10)
May 2014 (6)
April 2014 (9)
March 2014 (3)
February 2014 (4)
January 2014 (8)
December 2013 (5)
November 2013 (2)
October 2013 (9)
September 2013 (10)
August 2013 (8)
July 2013 (4)
June 2013 (8)
May 2013 (13)
April 2013 (2)
March 2013 (7)
February 2013 (7)
January 2013 (10)
December 2012 (6)
November 2012 (20)
October 2012 (12)
September 2012 (27)
August 2012 (29)
July 2012 (22)
June 2012 (17)
May 2012 (23)
April 2012 (24)
March 2012 (27)
February 2012 (21)
January 2012 (12)
December 2011 (18)
November 2011 (20)
October 2011 (27)
September 2011 (17)
August 2011 (18)
July 2011 (45)
June 2011 (22)
May 2011 (23)
April 2011 (19)
March 2011 (36)
February 2011 (19)
January 2011 (22)
December 2010 (29)
November 2010 (37)
October 2010 (32)
September 2010 (43)
August 2010 (46)
July 2010 (37)
June 2010 (46)
May 2010 (29)
April 2010 (38)
March 2010 (27)
February 2010 (33)
January 2010 (34)
December 2009 (13)
November 2009 (20)
October 2009 (29)
September 2009 (18)
August 2009 (29)
July 2009 (19)
June 2009 (18)
May 2009 (23)
April 2009 (16)
March 2009 (13)
February 2009 (20)
January 2009 (25)
December 2008 (25)
November 2008 (29)
October 2008 (34)
September 2008 (33)
August 2008 (36)
July 2008 (31)
June 2008 (25)
May 2008 (26)
April 2008 (33)
March 2008 (31)
February 2008 (24)
January 2008 (18)
December 2007 (27)
November 2007 (51)
October 2007 (24)
September 2007 (32)
August 2007 (24)
July 2007 (20)
June 2007 (28)
May 2007 (27)
April 2007 (24)
March 2007 (47)
February 2007 (21)
January 2007 (41)
December 2006 (21)
November 2006 (16)
October 2006 (24)
September 2006 (36)
August 2006 (30)
July 2006 (31)
June 2006 (37)
May 2006 (13)
April 2006 (13)
March 2006 (18)
February 2006 (20)
January 2006 (13)
December 2005 (6)
November 2005 (15)
October 2005 (15)
September 2005 (16)
August 2005 (7)
April 2005 (1)
March 2004 (4)
February 2004 (6)
January 2004 (1)
November 2003 (4)
October 2003 (22)
September 2003 (22)
August 2003 (15)
July 2003 (14)

Copyright 2014 by DNN Corp | Terms of Use | Privacy | Design by Parker Moore Design